Hydrogen on Demand
I've been working with Hydrogen on Demand going on eight years now. Have had great luck with fuel mileage & a lot of power. Have it in a 1984 Toyota motor home, 1990 Ford F-350 Diesel, two big rigs, 2007 Golf Stream with a Ford v10, and two Harley s. I've seen as much as a 41% increase in mileage the worst was 21% increase.From the first time you turn the key you can tell a difference it will run smoother and when you approach a hill seems to go right up without giving any more gas pedal. These engines are blowing out raw fuel out the tailpipe so they put a catalytic converter on to burn the fuel before it goes out the pipe. With all the smog or race equipment the exhaust valve opens before the burn is done, Hydrogen fires 100 times faster then gasoline just a whiff of Hydrogen will give you a more complete burn. I'm not using it for a fuel but an ignition source. A. "It doesn't work. It has never been proven to increase economy or decrease emissions by anyone..." R. Incorrect! The concept was proven to work in a laboratory environment, and documented by the US Dept. of Transportation in a publication called "Guidelines For Use of Hydrogen in Commercial Vehicles". Reduction in fuel use and emissions was below 8% in the lab test, and it was performed on a diesel engine, but it is proof that the concept of using vehicle power to produce hydroxy and inject it for a net thermodynamic gain is viable. A. "It violates the laws of thermodynamics/physics. You cannot get more energy out of a system then you put into it. It takes energy from the alternator and horsepower from the car to make the HHO, and you'll never recover all the energy used to make the HHO by burning it in your engine. The system creates a net loss of energy and there's no gains." R. That argument is absolutely correct when applied to burning the HHO as fuel in the engine, and this is why we don't have cars literally running on water, or even partial water cars yet. However, HHO injection systems are not using the HHO for fuel but rather an enabler for a more thorough extraction of the energy content already contained in the gasoline or diesel, hence better combustion. It does this by interaction with the fuel chemically in the thermal catalytic cracking process within the engine, increasing the volume of extractable fuel, burn rate, flame propagation within the combustion chamber, and intensity of the burn. A net gain in energy is created from recovered thermodynamic losses while using the system properly. The article listed in the previous rebuttal is the proof that what I write is true.
